state of Maharashtra vs Dhisulal Iairanathji Choudhari — 2000811/2005
Case under Explosives Act Section 45. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS200003822005
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2000811/2005
Filing Date
16-06-2005
Registration No
2000811/2005
Registration Date
16-06-2005
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Sinnar
Judge
2-2ND Jt. CJJD AND JMFC
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
SINNAR POLICE STATION
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Dhisulal Iairanathji Choudhari
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2ND Jt. CJJD AND JMFC
Hearing
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 12-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 08-12-2025 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 07-08-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 811/2005 (State vs. Ghisulal), the court ordered the proceedings to be stopped and the accused discharged under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The accused had been absent since long and despite non-bailable warrants and notices to sureties, the prosecution failed to secure their presence. The matter was over 12 years old at the time of disposal (2017), and the court exercised discretionary stopping of proceedings considering the prolonged pendency and High Court directions to dispose of old cases expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 811/2005 (State vs. Ghisulal), the court ordered the proceedings to be stopped and the accused discharged under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The accused had been absent since long and despite non-bailable warrants and notices to sureties, the prosecution failed to secure their presence. The matter was over 12 years old at the time of disposal (2017), and the court exercised discretionary stopping of proceedings considering the prolonged pendency and High Court directions to dispose of old cases expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts