Gaurav Dipak Patil vs State Thr. Rajya Utpadan Shulk — 35/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHNS200001582026

e-Filing Number

29-01-2026

Filing Number

158/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Sinnar

Judge

3-Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gaurav Dipak Patil

    Adv. Sakib Papabhai Pathan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Thr. Rajya Utpadan Shulk

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the applicant's application for interim custody of his seized iPhone 13 Pro, based on verified proof of ownership through purchase receipt and Aadhar card, citing the Supreme Court principle that there is no reason to keep seized property idle without use. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,50,000, cannot transfer or materially alter the device, and must produce it as required by the court until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And JMFC

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's application for interim custody of his seized iPhone 13 Pro, based on verified proof of ownership through purchase receipt and Aadhar card, citing the Supreme Court principle that there is no reason to keep seized property idle without use. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,50,000, cannot transfer or materially alter the device, and must produce it as required by the court until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case