Anna Maruti Borse Kumbhar vs Rajendra Bhaskar Shinde And Other — 336/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 39 rule 1& 2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS190019652025
e-Filing Number
25-11-2025
Filing Number
477/2025
Filing Date
25-Nov-2025
Registration No
336/2025
Registration Date
25-Nov-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola
Judge
5-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anna Maruti Borse Kumbhar
Adv. ADV HEMANSHU SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajendra Bhaskar Shinde And Other
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction (R.C.S. No. 336/2025) seeking protection against dispossession of adjacent properties. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of possession in either suit property 1(a) or 1(b), lacking cogent documentary evidence despite filing various certificates and receipts. Since no arguable case was demonstrated and no irreparable loss would result from denial, the application was dismissed with costs in cause (Order dated 24/03/2026, Civil Judge, Yeola, Nashik). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
10-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
06-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Dec-2025
No Say Order
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
09-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 336/2025
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction (R.C.S. No. 336/2025) seeking protection against dispossession of adjacent properties. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of possession in either suit property 1(a) or 1(b), lacking cogent documentary evidence despite filing various certificates and receipts. Since no arguable case was demonstrated and no irreparable loss would result from denial, the application was dismissed with costs in cause (Order dated 24/03/2026, Civil Judge, Yeola, Nashik). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts