Prabhakar Dattu Pendhare Alias Pendharkar vs Subhash Dattu Pendhare Alias Pendharkar — 246/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS190019512022
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
365/2022
Filing Date
23-11-2022
Registration No
246/2022
Registration Date
23-11-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola
Judge
2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhakar Dattu Pendhare Alias Pendharkar
Adv. Yeotikar Mangesh A.
Respondent(s)
Subhash Dattu Pendhare Alias Pendharkar
Sarjerao Dattu Pendhare Alias Pendharkar
Dilip Dattu Pendhare Alias Pendharkar
Ramesh Dattu Pendhare Alias Pendharkar(Legal Heir)
Shakuntala Punjaram Suryawanshi(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Compromise
Compromise
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 03-02-2026 | Compromise | |
| 06-01-2026 | Compromise | |
| 11-11-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No. 1 for condonation of delay in filing the written statement was allowed. The court condoned the delay due to want of documents and permitted the defendant to file the written statement, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 200/- to the plaintiff. The court found that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff in this suit for declaration, partition, and permanent injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No. 1 for condonation of delay in filing the written statement was allowed. The court condoned the delay due to want of documents and permitted the defendant to file the written statement, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 200/- to the plaintiff. The court found that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff in this suit for declaration, partition, and permanent injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts