Vinay Ravindra Jain vs Sandeep Baburao Patil — 1900608/2015

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 25th August 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 25-Aug-2026

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS190012982015

Filing Number

1901615/2015

Filing Date

20-Nov-2015

Registration No

1900608/2015

Registration Date

20-Nov-2015

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola

Judge

2-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinay Ravindra Jain

    Adv. Kalantri Jugalkishor E.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandeep Baburao Patil

Case History

  1. 25-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  8. 10-Nov-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  9. 09-Oct-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  10. 18-Aug-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  11. 19-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  12. 19-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  13. 29-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  14. 29-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  15. 01-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  16. 23-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  17. 16-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  18. 20-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  19. 06-Jul-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

  20. 05-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

  21. 22-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

  22. 01-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  23. 16-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  24. 01-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  25. 07-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  26. 26-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  27. 03-Aug-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  28. 22-Jun-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  29. 18-May-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  30. 05-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  31. 27-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  32. 19-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  33. 13-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  34. 04-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  35. 07-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  36. 23-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  37. 24-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  38. 20-Apr-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  39. 29-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  40. 24-Nov-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  41. 11-Oct-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  42. 31-Jul-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  43. 08-Jul-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  44. 27-Apr-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  45. 28-Jan-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  46. 31-Dec-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  47. 12-Oct-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  48. 09-Jul-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  49. 06-May-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  50. 14-Feb-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  51. 12-Nov-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  52. 22-Aug-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  53. 24-May-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  54. 13-Mar-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  55. 13-Dec-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  56. 03-Oct-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  57. 16-Aug-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  58. 03-Jul-2018

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  59. 02-Jun-2018

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  60. 17-Apr-2018

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  61. 07-Mar-2018

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  62. 25-Jan-2018

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  63. 19-Dec-2017

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  64. 08-Nov-2017

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  65. 10-Oct-2017

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  66. 15-Sep-2017

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 1900608/2015 Vinay Ravindra Jain v. Sandeep Baburao Patil This Negotiable Instrument Act case involved multiple applications heard on 15/09/2017. The complainant sought witness summons for police custody of a disputed cheque and adjournment requests, while the accused sought orders against the complainant for delaying tactics. The Judicial Magistrate rejected all three applications: the complainant's witness summons application (Exh.44), adjournment application (Exh.47), and the accused's application for relief (Exh.46), finding the complainant had already obtained reasonable adjournments and noting pending arguments on related exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  67. 15-Sep-2017

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  68. 19-Aug-2017

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  69. 03-Aug-2017

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  70. 25-Jul-2017

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  71. 17-Jun-2017

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  72. 03-May-2017

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  73. 20-Apr-2017

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  74. 11-Apr-2017

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  75. 11-Mar-2017

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  76. 11-Feb-2017

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  77. 09-Feb-2017

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  78. 11-Jan-2017

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  79. 14-Dec-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  80. 05-Nov-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  81. 13-Oct-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  82. 06-Sep-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  83. 04-Aug-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  84. 13-Jul-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  85. 22-Jun-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  86. 17-May-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  87. 17-Mar-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  88. 09-Feb-2016

    Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  89. 14-Dec-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  90. 20-Nov-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1900608/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1900608/2015 Vinay Ravindra Jain v. Sandeep Baburao Patil This Negotiable Instrument Act case involved multiple applications heard on 15/09/2017. The complainant sought witness summons for police custody of a disputed cheque and adjournment requests, while the accused sought orders against the complainant for delaying tactics. The Judicial Magistrate rejected all three applications: the complainant's witness summons application (Exh.44), adjournment application (Exh.47), and the accused's application for relief (Exh.46), finding the complainant had already obtained reasonable adjournments and noting pending arguments on related exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case