Sabera Salam Inamdar vs Mohamad Husen Suleman Inamdar Advocate - Badwar Arvind B. — 182/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.39 rule 12. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS190012512023

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

08-07-2023

Filing Number

225/2023

Filing Date

10-07-2023

Registration No

182/2023

Registration Date

10-07-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola

Judge

2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section O.39 rule 12

Petitioner(s)

Sabera Salam Inamdar

Adv. Dattatray Sarjerao Chavan

Juber Salam Inamdar

Adv. Dattatray Sarjerao Chavan

Yasmin A Matin Shaha

Adv. Dattatray Sarjerao Chavan

Karishma Alias Firdos Wasim Shaha

Adv. Dattatray Sarjerao Chavan

Maytab Alias Shamabano Suleman Inamdar

Adv. Dattatray Sarjerao Chavan

Respondent(s)

Mohamad Husen Suleman Inamdar Advocate - Badwar Arvind B.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC

07-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Written Statement

13-02-2026

Written Statement

19-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

02-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

19-09-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to add Rajendra Raghunath Sanap as defendant No. 12 and to amend paragraphs 6 and 11d of the plaint within 14 days, as the subsequent sale of suit property during pendency does not change the nature of the partition, declaration, and permanent injunction suit and causes no prejudice to existing defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to add Rajendra Raghunath Sanap as defendant No. 12 and to amend paragraphs 6 and 11d of the plaint within 14 days, as the subsequent sale of suit property during pendency does not change the nature of the partition, declaration, and permanent injunction suit and causes no prejudice to existing defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case