Shivaji Vishwanath Gade vs Shashikala @ Sitabai Shivaji Shinde Advocate - Najgad Vitthal E. — 1900225/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 3912. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS190012182015

Filing Number

1900295/2015

Filing Date

17-Nov-2015

Registration No

1900225/2015

Registration Date

17-Nov-2015

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola

Judge

2-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 3912

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivaji Vishwanath Gade

    Adv. Davange Yogesh N.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shashikala @ Sitabai Shivaji Shinde Advocate - Najgad Vitthal E.

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  3. 13-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 14-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 05-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  6. 24-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  7. 22-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  8. 04-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  9. 17-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  10. 15-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  11. 27-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  12. 13-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  13. 16-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  14. 11-Jun-2024

    Order on Exh

  15. 16-Apr-2024

    Order on Exh

  16. 02-Apr-2024

    Order on Exh

  17. 26-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

  18. 26-Feb-2024

    Amended W.S.

  19. 23-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

  20. 02-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

  21. 04-Dec-2023

    Order on Exh

  22. 22-Nov-2023

    Order on Exh

  23. 07-Nov-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

  24. 12-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  25. 13-Jun-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  26. 25-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  27. 18-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  28. 20-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  29. 12-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  30. 23-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  31. 09-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  32. 11-Mar-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  33. 11-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  34. 09-Nov-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  35. 20-Aug-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  36. 09-Aug-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  37. 18-Jun-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  38. 06-Apr-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  39. 16-Feb-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  40. 01-Dec-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  41. 24-Sep-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  42. 20-Jul-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  43. 09-Jun-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  44. 03-Mar-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  45. 07-Jan-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  46. 05-Nov-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  47. 01-Oct-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  48. 22-Aug-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  49. 23-Jul-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  50. 18-Jun-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  51. 16-Apr-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  52. 19-Mar-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  53. 05-Feb-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  54. 01-Jan-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  55. 13-Nov-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  56. 03-Oct-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  57. 21-Aug-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  58. 19-Jul-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  59. 19-Jun-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  60. 12-Apr-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  61. 27-Feb-2018

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  62. 09-Jan-2018

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  63. 06-Dec-2017

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  64. 23-Oct-2017

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  65. 01-Sep-2017

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  66. 18-Jul-2017

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  67. 04-Jul-2017

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  68. 12-Jun-2017

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  69. 24-Mar-2017

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  70. 06-Feb-2017

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  71. 13-Dec-2016

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  72. 25-Oct-2016

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  73. 27-Sep-2016

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: Shivaji Vishwanath Gade v. Shashikala @ Sitabai Shivaji Shinde (Civil Suit 225/2015) Outcome: Plaintiff's injunction application (Exh.5) was rejected, while defendant's counter-claim application (Exh.20) was allowed. The plaintiff was temporarily restrained from obstructing the defendant's possession of the agricultural property. Key Finding: The court found the defendant had a stronger prima facie case, relying on continuous revenue records showing the defendant's name in cultivation records from 2003-2016, versus the plaintiff's unregistered 1996 agreement-to-sell (which the defendant denied). The plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of possession, expenditure, or cultivation efforts despite claiming 20 years of occupation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  74. 27-Sep-2016

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  75. 20-Sep-2016

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  76. 30-Aug-2016

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  77. 16-Aug-2016

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  78. 18-Jun-2016

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  79. 07-Jun-2016

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  80. 29-Apr-2016

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  81. 26-Apr-2016

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  82. 12-Apr-2016

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  83. 29-Mar-2016

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  84. 08-Mar-2016

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  85. 09-Feb-2016

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  86. 19-Jan-2016

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  87. 29-Dec-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  88. 17-Nov-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1900225/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Shivaji Vishwanath Gade v. Shashikala @ Sitabai Shivaji Shinde (Civil Suit 225/2015) Outcome: Plaintiff's injunction application (Exh.5) was rejected, while defendant's counter-claim application (Exh.20) was allowed. The plaintiff was temporarily restrained from obstructing the defendant's possession of the agricultural property. Key Finding: The court found the defendant had a stronger prima facie case, relying on continuous revenue records showing the defendant's name in cultivation records from 2003-2016, versus the plaintiff's unregistered 1996 agreement-to-sell (which the defendant denied). The plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of possession, expenditure, or cultivation efforts despite claiming 20 years of occupation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case