Shital Vyanktesh Kodmur vs Vishnu Pavansa Kokane Advocate - Rashinkar Anand S. — 140/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Additional W.S.. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS190011302022
Filing Number
210/2022
Filing Date
15-Jul-2022
Registration No
140/2022
Registration Date
15-Jul-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola
Judge
2-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shital Vyanktesh Kodmur
Adv. Patil Pradip S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vishnu Pavansa Kokane Advocate - Rashinkar Anand S.
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Additional W.S.
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
Amended Plaint
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
10-Mar-2026
Steps
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
25-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
05-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
13-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
24-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
01-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
06-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
24-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
21-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
22-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
18-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
09-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
25-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
07-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
07-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
13-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
26-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
18-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
09-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
12-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
15-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
08-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
26-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
02-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
19-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
30-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
01-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
20-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
05-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
20-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-May-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
19-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
05-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
15-Mar-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
22-Feb-2023
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Dec-2022
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
21-Nov-2022
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary: The plaintiff's application seeking an injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing her possession, construction, and measurement of a disputed property (C.T.S. No. 2774) in Yeola, Nashik was rejected. The court found the plaintiff lacks a prima facie case because the property was jointly purchased by two co-owners in 1994, and the plaintiff's 2020 purchase of only a half undivided share without clear boundary demarcation does not establish her right to prevent the defendant (the co-owner's heir) from using his portion, particularly as no partition occurred between the original owners or their legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Nov-2022
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Nov-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
07-Nov-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Oct-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
10-Oct-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Oct-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
30-Sep-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
26-Sep-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
22-Sep-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
19-Sep-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
13-Sep-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
30-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Jul-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
22-Jul-2022
Notice_Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
20-Jul-2022
Notice_Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Jul-2022
First Order
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
15-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 140/2022
Summary: The plaintiff's application seeking an injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing her possession, construction, and measurement of a disputed property (C.T.S. No. 2774) in Yeola, Nashik was rejected. The court found the plaintiff lacks a prima facie case because the property was jointly purchased by two co-owners in 1994, and the plaintiff's 2020 purchase of only a half undivided share without clear boundary demarcation does not establish her right to prevent the defendant (the co-owner's heir) from using his portion, particularly as no partition occurred between the original owners or their legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts