Sunand Dilip Kadam vs Kisan Gangadhar Vaidya Advocate - Chavan Dattatray S. — 101/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Defence Evidence Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS190008642018

Filing Number

146/2018

Filing Date

05-Jul-2018

Registration No

101/2018

Registration Date

05-Jul-2018

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola

Judge

4-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39
Ia/1/2021 Classification : Interrogatories Section Sunand Dilip KadamKisan Gangadhar Vaidya

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunand Dilip Kadam

    Adv. Zalte Anil U.

  2. 2.Rameshwat Dilip Kadam

  3. 3.Ishwar Dilip Kadam

  4. 4.Sangita Bhausaheb Kale

  5. 5.Kavita Deepak Shirsath

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kisan Gangadhar Vaidya Advocate - Chavan Dattatray S.

  2. 2.Ravsaheb Gangadhar Vaidya

  3. 3.Rambhabai Gangadhar Vaidya

  4. 4.Shankar Gangadhar Vaidya

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  5. 29-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  6. 09-Oct-2025

    Defence Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  7. 13-Aug-2025

    Defence Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  8. 26-Jun-2025

    Defence Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jd And JMFC, Yeola

  9. 29-Mar-2025

    Defence Evidence

  10. 22-Jan-2025

    Defence Evidence

  11. 11-Dec-2024

    Defence Evidence

  12. 10-Oct-2024

    Defence Evidence

  13. 22-Aug-2024

    Defence Evidence

  14. 08-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  15. 04-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  16. 09-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  17. 16-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  18. 01-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  19. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  20. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  21. 13-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  22. 09-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  23. 30-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  24. 26-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  25. 21-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  26. 15-Feb-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  27. 17-Jan-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  28. 08-Dec-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  29. 08-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  30. 29-Sep-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  31. 30-Aug-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  32. 19-Jul-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  33. 07-May-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  34. 21-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  35. 28-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  36. 29-Nov-2021

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Regular Civil Suit No. 101/2018 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary, perpetual, and mandatory injunction was rejected on 29 November 2021. The court found the plaintiffs lacked a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored the defendants. The dispute concerned property (Gat No. 285) allegedly sold conditionally in 1967 for Rs. 550; plaintiffs claimed repayment entitled them to re-conveyance, while defendants asserted the conditional sale deed (No. 419/1967) made them absolute owners after the stipulated period expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  37. 29-Nov-2021

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  38. 20-Nov-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  39. 25-Oct-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  40. 12-Oct-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  41. 28-Sep-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  42. 23-Sep-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  43. 28-Jul-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  44. 04-May-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  45. 10-Mar-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  46. 17-Feb-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  47. 02-Jan-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  48. 03-Nov-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  49. 05-Sep-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  50. 07-Jul-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  51. 22-Apr-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  52. 15-Apr-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  53. 24-Mar-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  54. 21-Mar-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  55. 13-Mar-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  56. 15-Feb-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  57. 08-Jan-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  58. 20-Dec-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  59. 27-Nov-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  60. 07-Nov-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  61. 05-Oct-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  62. 07-Sep-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  63. 26-Jul-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  64. 28-Jun-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  65. 24-Apr-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  66. 03-Apr-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  67. 06-Feb-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  68. 14-Jan-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  69. 21-Nov-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  70. 17-Oct-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  71. 11-Sep-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  72. 24-Aug-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  73. 02-Aug-2018

    Reply Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  74. 10-Jul-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  75. 05-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  76. 05-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Regular Civil Suit No. 101/2018 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary, perpetual, and mandatory injunction was rejected on 29 November 2021. The court found the plaintiffs lacked a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored the defendants. The dispute concerned property (Gat No. 285) allegedly sold conditionally in 1967 for Rs. 550; plaintiffs claimed repayment entitled them to re-conveyance, while defendants asserted the conditional sale deed (No. 419/1967) made them absolute owners after the stipulated period expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case