Sandip sudhakar Ghatkar vs Yeola Muncipal councial Advocate - Londhe Rohidas B. — 109/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS190006532025

e-Filing Number

28-03-2025

Filing Number

160/2025

Filing Date

01-Apr-2025

Registration No

109/2025

Registration Date

01-Apr-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola

Judge

2-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sandip sudhakar Ghatkar

    Adv. Yogesh Najagad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yeola Muncipal councial Advocate - Londhe Rohidas B.

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  8. 08-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  9. 13-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  10. 07-May-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for an interim order to restrain the defendant from constructing a wall on the shared property boundary. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in their favor, and did not suffer irreparable harm warranting interim relief. The final decision on the substantive dispute regarding property ownership and construction rights is reserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 07-May-2025

    Issues

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  12. 29-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  13. 28-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  14. 21-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  15. 19-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  16. 17-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  17. 03-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  18. 01-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 01-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 109/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for an interim order to restrain the defendant from constructing a wall on the shared property boundary. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in their favor, and did not suffer irreparable harm warranting interim relief. The final decision on the substantive dispute regarding property ownership and construction rights is reserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case