Sandip sudhakar Ghatkar vs Yeola Muncipal councial Advocate - Londhe Rohidas B. — 109/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS190006532025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

28-03-2025

Filing Number

160/2025

Filing Date

01-04-2025

Registration No

109/2025

Registration Date

01-04-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola

Judge

2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37

Petitioner(s)

Sandip sudhakar Ghatkar

Adv. Yogesh Najagad

Respondent(s)

Yeola Muncipal councial Advocate - Londhe Rohidas B.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC

28-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

25-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

29-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-11-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

07-05-2025
Order on T.I.

Summary The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for an interim order to restrain the defendant from constructing a wall on the shared property boundary. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in their favor, and did not suffer irreparable harm warranting interim relief. The final decision on the substantive dispute regarding property ownership and construction rights is reserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for an interim order to restrain the defendant from constructing a wall on the shared property boundary. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in their favor, and did not suffer irreparable harm warranting interim relief. The final decision on the substantive dispute regarding property ownership and construction rights is reserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Yeola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case