State Through Inspector, State Excise Malegaon Division vs Chetan Hari Sonawane Advocate - Shinde Kunal S. — 835/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS180015412025

Filing Number

1235/2025

Filing Date

05-Dec-2025

Registration No

835/2025

Registration Date

05-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

269

Police Station

STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Through Inspector, State Excise Malegaon Division

    Adv. APP Bade Sachin J.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chetan Hari Sonawane Advocate - Shinde Kunal S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court discharged accused Chetan Hari Sonwane of offences under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and disposed the case under Section 281 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, reasoning that no Competent Authority report was filed despite the charge-sheet being filed on 05/12/2025. The bail bonds were cancelled, and seized property was ordered to be sent to the State Excise Department or auctioned with proceeds credited to State Treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 835/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court discharged accused Chetan Hari Sonwane of offences under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and disposed the case under Section 281 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, reasoning that no Competent Authority report was filed despite the charge-sheet being filed on 05/12/2025. The bail bonds were cancelled, and seized property was ordered to be sent to the State Excise Department or auctioned with proceeds credited to State Treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case