State Thr. Inspector State Execise Flying Squad 2, Satana vs Dnyaneshwar Bajirao pawar Advocate - Shinde Subhash A — 833/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS180015392025

Filing Number

1233/2025

Filing Date

05-Dec-2025

Registration No

833/2025

Registration Date

05-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

296

Police Station

STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Thr. Inspector State Execise Flying Squad 2, Satana

    Adv. APP Bade Sachin J.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dnyaneshwar Bajirao pawar Advocate - Shinde Subhash A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused, Gyaneshwar Bajiraw Pawar, of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including the lack of chemical analysis report of the seized liquor bottles and insufficient credibility of the witness testimony regarding the seizure procedure. Consequently, the accused was granted unconditional acquittal under Indian Penal Code Section 278(1), and his bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 833/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused, Gyaneshwar Bajiraw Pawar, of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including the lack of chemical analysis report of the seized liquor bottles and insufficient credibility of the witness testimony regarding the seizure procedure. Consequently, the accused was granted unconditional acquittal under Indian Penal Code Section 278(1), and his bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case