State Thr. Inspector State Execise Flying Squad 2, Satana vs Dnyaneshwar Bajirao pawar Advocate - Shinde Subhash A — 833/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS180015392025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1233/2025

Filing Date

05-12-2025

Registration No

833/2025

Registration Date

05-12-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

296

Police Station

STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State Thr. Inspector State Execise Flying Squad 2, Satana

Adv. APP Bade Sachin J.

Respondent(s)

Dnyaneshwar Bajirao pawar Advocate - Shinde Subhash A

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC

10-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

Arguments

05-12-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court acquitted the accused, Gyaneshwar Bajiraw Pawar, of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including the lack of chemical analysis report of the seized liquor bottles and insufficient credibility of the witness testimony regarding the seizure procedure. Consequently, the accused was granted unconditional acquittal under Indian Penal Code Section 278(1), and his bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused, Gyaneshwar Bajiraw Pawar, of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including the lack of chemical analysis report of the seized liquor bottles and insufficient credibility of the witness testimony regarding the seizure procedure. Consequently, the accused was granted unconditional acquittal under Indian Penal Code Section 278(1), and his bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case