Jijabai Ramesh Raut vs Ashok Yevaji Gavit etc 2 Advocate - Patil Ashok R — 1800099/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CivilProcedure. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS180014362015
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1800099/2015
Filing Date
17-11-2015
Registration No
1800099/2015
Registration Date
17-11-2015
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jijabai Ramesh Raut
Adv. Wagh Nilesh N.
Respondent(s)
Ashok Yevaji Gavit etc 2 Advocate - Patil Ashok R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Amended Plaint
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Amended Plaint | |
| 21-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 27-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Jijabaai Raut v. Ashok Gavit (Civil Suit No. 99/2015, Signature Order No. 78) Outcome: The petition for amendment/rectification of the original suit is ALLOWED. The court permitted the plaintiff to amend and correct the suit plaint by including details regarding ancestral agricultural properties (specifically plots nos. 67/1 and 67/2 at Kalvan), their ownership, and related claims before a specified future date. The court rejected the defendant's opposition and found that the proposed amendments would clarify the case and resolve complexities without prejudicing either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Jijabaai Raut v. Ashok Gavit (Civil Suit No. 99/2015, Signature Order No. 78) Outcome: The petition for amendment/rectification of the original suit is ALLOWED. The court permitted the plaintiff to amend and correct the suit plaint by including details regarding ancestral agricultural properties (specifically plots nos. 67/1 and 67/2 at Kalvan), their ownership, and related claims before a specified future date. The court rejected the defendant's opposition and found that the proposed amendments would clarify the case and resolve complexities without prejudicing either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts