Mohan Sonda Shewale etc 4 vs Rajaram Sonda Shewale etc 3 Advocate - Deshmukh Balwant D. — 1800078/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CivilProcedure. Disposed: Contested--SUIT DECREED, COUNTER CLAIMS DECREED on 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS180011922015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1800078/2015
Filing Date
26-09-2015
Registration No
1800078/2015
Registration Date
26-09-2015
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--SUIT DECREED, COUNTER CLAIMS DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohan Sonda Shewale etc 4
Adv. Chandratre Nitin p
Respondent(s)
Rajaram Sonda Shewale etc 3 Advocate - Deshmukh Balwant D.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' suit. The court declared that the plaintiffs have ownership and possession rights over agricultural plot No. 220/1 as per the 1982 partition, and they have the right to use a 10-foot wide path on the northern side for access. The court issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing or hindering the plaintiffs' use and enjoyment of this common pathway and their property. The defendants' counter-claim was rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' suit. The court declared that the plaintiffs have ownership and possession rights over agricultural plot No. 220/1 as per the 1982 partition, and they have the right to use a 10-foot wide path on the northern side for access. The court issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing or hindering the plaintiffs' use and enjoyment of this common pathway and their property. The defendants' counter-claim was rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts