Bayjabai Dattu Wagh vs Balu Tulshiram Patil and other Advocate - Wagh Kautik B. — 104/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS180011682016
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
146/2016
Filing Date
04-11-2016
Registration No
104/2016
Registration Date
04-11-2016
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bayjabai Dattu Wagh
Adv. Patil Balasaheb W
Respondent(s)
Balu Tulshiram Patil and other Advocate - Wagh Kautik B.
Jivan Subhash More
Adv. Wagh Kautik B.
Jyoti Subhsh More
Umesh Vishnu More
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to restrain defendants from alienating ancestral land was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the suit land was received by her father as tenancy land (not ancestral property), and any alienations made in 1985-1986 are protected under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which does not apply retroactively. Additionally, the plaintiff's 30-year delay in filing the suit was hit by the principle of laches. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to restrain defendants from alienating ancestral land was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the suit land was received by her father as tenancy land (not ancestral property), and any alienations made in 1985-1986 are protected under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which does not apply retroactively. Additionally, the plaintiff's 30-year delay in filing the suit was hit by the principle of laches. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts