State Through Kalwan Police Station vs Eknath Namdeo Bachhav Advocate - Wagh Nilesh N. — 92/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS180010112020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
933/2020
Filing Date
06-10-2020
Registration No
92/2020
Registration Date
06-10-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
KALWAN POLICE STATION
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through Kalwan Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Eknath Namdeo Bachhav Advocate - Wagh Nilesh N.
Vimalbai Eknath Bachhav
Adv. Patil Amol G.
Narendra Eknath Bachhav
Adv. Patil Amol G.
Savita Narendra Bachhav
Adv. Patil Amol G.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 25-11-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted accused nos. 1, 2, and 4 under IPC sections 324, 323 read with section 34 (criminal intimidation with common intention), finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case that the accused intentionally caused injuries to the complainant and witnesses. The court held that the testimony of prosecution witnesses failed to establish the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as their accounts lacked consistency and corroboration regarding the incident that occurred on June 25, 2020. Accused no. 3 was deceased, so proceedings against him were abated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted accused nos. 1, 2, and 4 under IPC sections 324, 323 read with section 34 (criminal intimidation with common intention), finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case that the accused intentionally caused injuries to the complainant and witnesses. The court held that the testimony of prosecution witnesses failed to establish the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as their accounts lacked consistency and corroboration regarding the incident that occurred on June 25, 2020. Accused no. 3 was deceased, so proceedings against him were abated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts