State Through Kalwan Police Station vs Balu Deoba Bacchav Advocate - Patil Dhananjay Y — 78/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,143,146,147,148,149,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS180007902020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
724/2020
Filing Date
04-09-2020
Registration No
78/2020
Registration Date
04-09-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
KALWAN POLICE STATION
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through Kalwan Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Balu Deoba Bacchav Advocate - Patil Dhananjay Y
Dinesh Balu Bacchav
Adv. Patil Dhananjay Y
Nagesh Balu Bacchav
Adv. Patil Dhananjay Y
Surekha Balu Bacchav
Adv. Patil Dhananjay Y
Chitra Dinesh Bacchav
Adv. Patil Dhananjay Y
Sonali Nagesh Bacchav
Adv. Patil Dhananjay Y
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 25-11-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all six accused of charges under IPC sections 148, 326, 323, 504, 506 with section 149. The court found that while the complainant and witness testified about an assault with weapons and threats, the prosecution failed to present corroborating evidence—particularly the underlined portions of the FIR that detailed the alleged incident and contradicted the witnesses' testimonies. Key evidence (seized weapons) was ordered destroyed as it had no evidentiary value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all six accused of charges under IPC sections 148, 326, 323, 504, 506 with section 149. The court found that while the complainant and witness testified about an assault with weapons and threats, the prosecution failed to present corroborating evidence—particularly the underlined portions of the FIR that detailed the alleged incident and contradicted the witnesses' testimonies. Key evidence (seized weapons) was ordered destroyed as it had no evidentiary value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts