Nimba Supa Pagar vs Samadhan Balu Shirsath etc 2 Advocate - Junnare Amit V. — 1800074/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section injun. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS180006002012
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1800074/2012
Filing Date
19-04-2012
Registration No
1800074/2012
Registration Date
02-05-2012
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nimba Supa Pagar
Adv. Chandratre Nitin p
Respondent(s)
Samadhan Balu Shirsath etc 2 Advocate - Junnare Amit V.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 02-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 14-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 19-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Order Case: R.C.S. No. 74/12 | Court: District Court, Nashik | Date of Decision: 25 March 2014 Outcome: The plaintiff's suit for partition of agricultural land (Survey No. 240) in Pipalgaon, Devla, Nashik district was allowed with costs. The court held that defendants 1-3 unlawfully encroached on 38 acres within the plaintiff's property and directed them to vacate and restore possession to the plaintiff, who is declared the rightful owner of the disputed plot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Order Case: R.C.S. No. 74/12 | Court: District Court, Nashik | Date of Decision: 25 March 2014 Outcome: The plaintiff's suit for partition of agricultural land (Survey No. 240) in Pipalgaon, Devla, Nashik district was allowed with costs. The court held that defendants 1-3 unlawfully encroached on 38 acres within the plaintiff's property and directed them to vacate and restore possession to the plaintiff, who is declared the rightful owner of the disputed plot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts