State vs Sandip Popat Waghmode etc 3 Advocate - Shinde Kunal S. — 60/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,34. Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS180004732017
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
420/2017
Filing Date
15-05-2017
Registration No
60/2017
Registration Date
15-05-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
FIR Details
FIR Number
I 71
Police Station
KALWAN POLICE STATION
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. Aher Vinayak K. APP
Respondent(s)
Sandip Popat Waghmode etc 3 Advocate - Shinde Kunal S.
Santosh Vithal Bhise
Hiraman Dhavalu Bagul
Pramod Balkrushna Deshpande
Dnyaneshwar S. Babar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready | |
| 02-02-2026 | N.B.W._Ready | |
| 29-12-2025 | N.B.W._Ready | |
| 10-11-2025 | N.B.W._Ready | |
| 19-09-2025 | N.B.W._Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In R.C.C. No. 60/2017, the court ordered that non-bailable warrants (NBW) and notice to surety be issued against accused No. 1 and 2 (Hiraman Dhavlu Bagul and Pramod Balkrishna Deshpande) for offences under IPC Section 420 read with 34. The trial of accused No. 3 and 4, who are regularly attending court proceedings, was separated from the other accused due to the case's age and the non-availability of accused No. 1, 2, and 5 (absconded). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In R.C.C. No. 60/2017, the court ordered that non-bailable warrants (NBW) and notice to surety be issued against accused No. 1 and 2 (Hiraman Dhavlu Bagul and Pramod Balkrishna Deshpande) for offences under IPC Section 420 read with 34. The trial of accused No. 3 and 4, who are regularly attending court proceedings, was separated from the other accused due to the case's age and the non-availability of accused No. 1, 2, and 5 (absconded). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts