Dattatray Ananda Bhamre Etc 1 vs Ananda Karbhari Bhamre Etc 6 Advocate - Pawar Anita S — 34/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section C,P,Code. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS180004292017
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
47/2017
Filing Date
22-04-2017
Registration No
34/2017
Registration Date
22-04-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattatray Ananda Bhamre Etc 1
Adv. Jadhav Ganesh K.
Respondent(s)
Ananda Karbhari Bhamre Etc 6 Advocate - Pawar Anita S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The application for amendment of plaint under CPC Order VI Rule 17 was partly allowed. The court permitted amendments (3-7) to incorporate facts regarding an illegal sale transaction of the suit land that occurred during trial pendency, allowing the plaintiff to seek declaration that the sale deed is void and to amend the cause of action and prayer clause. However, amendments (1-2) seeking to change the suit from "Regular Civil Suit" to "Special Civil Suit" and transfer jurisdiction to a higher court were rejected as the suit remains within the court's pecuniary jurisdiction. The plaintiff was directed to pay costs of Rs. 1,000 and file the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The application for amendment of plaint under CPC Order VI Rule 17 was partly allowed. The court permitted amendments (3-7) to incorporate facts regarding an illegal sale transaction of the suit land that occurred during trial pendency, allowing the plaintiff to seek declaration that the sale deed is void and to amend the cause of action and prayer clause. However, amendments (1-2) seeking to change the suit from "Regular Civil Suit" to "Special Civil Suit" and transfer jurisdiction to a higher court were rejected as the suit remains within the court's pecuniary jurisdiction. The plaintiff was directed to pay costs of Rs. 1,000 and file the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts