Lankesh Sitaram Bagul vs State Through Deola Police Station — 11/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHNS180001952026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
149/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lankesh Sitaram Bagul
Adv. Ganesh Walinkar
Respondent(s)
State Through Deola Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed the application and ordered release of the seized Mahindra Swaraj 744-XT tractor (Reg. No. MH-41/BH-0640) and Shaktiman rotavetor to applicant Lankesh Bagul upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 4,50,000. The court found the applicant was the rightful owner (supported by RC book, insurance, and Aadhar card) and reasoned that keeping vehicles seized for crime No. 13/2026 at the police station served no legal purpose and risked deterioration. The applicant must maintain the vehicles, not sell or alter them, and produce them as directed until final case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the application and ordered release of the seized Mahindra Swaraj 744-XT tractor (Reg. No. MH-41/BH-0640) and Shaktiman rotavetor to applicant Lankesh Bagul upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 4,50,000. The court found the applicant was the rightful owner (supported by RC book, insurance, and Aadhar card) and reasoned that keeping vehicles seized for crime No. 13/2026 at the police station served no legal purpose and risked deterioration. The applicant must maintain the vehicles, not sell or alter them, and produce them as directed until final case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts