State Through Inspector, State Excise Malegaon Division vs Tukaram Bapu Pawar Advocate - Patil Dhananjay Y — 26/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65b,c,d,e,f. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS180000542026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

287

Police Station

STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65b,c,d,e,f

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Through Inspector, State Excise Malegaon Division

    Adv. APP Bade Sachin J.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tukaram Bapu Pawar Advocate - Patil Dhananjay Y

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court discharged accused Tukaram Bapu Pawar of offences under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Section 65(e)) under Section 281 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita because no Complaint/Arrest (C.A.) report was filed despite the chargesheet being filed on 13/01/2026. The court found continuing the proceedings without the C.A. report served no purpose and therefore stopped the proceedings, cancelled bail bonds, and ordered seizured illicit liquor destroyed and other property auctioned with proceeds credited to State Treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged accused Tukaram Bapu Pawar of offences under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Section 65(e)) under Section 281 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita because no Complaint/Arrest (C.A.) report was filed despite the chargesheet being filed on 13/01/2026. The court found continuing the proceedings without the C.A. report served no purpose and therefore stopped the proceedings, cancelled bail bonds, and ordered seizured illicit liquor destroyed and other property auctioned with proceeds credited to State Treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case