Smt.Tarabai Bhaskar Waghetc vs Shri.Eknath Narayan Wagh etc Advocate - Bhamare Ramesh P, Shri. U.H.Ahre — 1800007/2007
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Partition. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS180000502007
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7/2007
Filing Date
22-01-2007
Registration No
1800007/2007
Registration Date
22-01-2007
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Kalwan
Judge
2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Tarabai Bhaskar Waghetc
Adv. Smt. S.R. Bachhav
Respondent(s)
Shri.Eknath Narayan Wagh etc Advocate - Bhamare Ramesh P, Shri. U.H.Ahre
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 10-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 20-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 02-12-2025 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 28-10-2025 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (RCS 07/2007) decided by the Junior Civil Court, Kalyān, on 18 February 2015. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit and ordered both parties to bear their own costs. The case involved a dispute over joint family property (Schedule Case No. 612 and 443-B/3), with the court finding that the plaintiff could not establish her claim to the property in question, as the land records (Gavs) showed the property belonged to defendant No. 1's self-acquired property, not joint family property as claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (RCS 07/2007) decided by the Junior Civil Court, Kalyān, on 18 February 2015. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit and ordered both parties to bear their own costs. The case involved a dispute over joint family property (Schedule Case No. 612 and 443-B/3), with the court finding that the plaintiff could not establish her claim to the property in question, as the land records (Gavs) showed the property belonged to defendant No. 1's self-acquired property, not joint family property as claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts