State Government vs Ajaysing Nand Bhati Advocate - Shaikh Yunus R — 364/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304,A,284,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS170008962018
Next Hearing
16th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
745/2018
Filing Date
27-11-2018
Registration No
364/2018
Registration Date
27-11-2018
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Nandgaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
NANDGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. Diwate Jayant K. APP
Respondent(s)
Ajaysing Nand Bhati Advocate - Shaikh Yunus R
Tejrao Amrut Kale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness examination record (Case No. 364/2018) from a Marathi court involving an incident on 24/06/2018 where a woman (Alkabaai) suffered a head injury during blasting work on a well. The witness (Prakash Yadav Shingade), a driver, provided testimony about transporting the injured woman to government hospital and confirmed knowledge of the two accused involved in the blasting operation. During cross-examination, the witness retracted his earlier statements, claiming he did not witness the incident and had no direct knowledge of the events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness examination record (Case No. 364/2018) from a Marathi court involving an incident on 24/06/2018 where a woman (Alkabaai) suffered a head injury during blasting work on a well. The witness (Prakash Yadav Shingade), a driver, provided testimony about transporting the injured woman to government hospital and confirmed knowledge of the two accused involved in the blasting operation. During cross-examination, the witness retracted his earlier statements, claiming he did not witness the incident and had no direct knowledge of the events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts