Gokul Babulal Kothari vs Vilas Sukdev Wagh — 60/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHNS170008742024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-08-2024

Filing Number

714/2024

Filing Date

02-08-2024

Registration No

60/2024

Registration Date

02-08-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Nandgaon

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),316(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Gokul Babulal Kothari

Adv. Binnar Balkrishna B

Respondent(s)

Vilas Sukdev Wagh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Steps_Unready

29-01-2026

Steps_Unready

24-11-2025

Steps_Unready

29-09-2025

Steps_Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Decree

This is a Marathi language judgment from the National Public Interest Litigation Court (राष्ट्रीय लोक अदालत). While the document is partially legible, the critical decision section contains heavy handwriting and marks that make the specific court order difficult to read with certainty. The judgment appears to address a matter involving court fees and procedural issues, with signatures from the presiding judge and panel members dated 14/03/2026. SKIP — The key reasoning and specific decision are not sufficiently clear due to handwritten annotations and unclear text in the critical portions of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Marathi language judgment from the National Public Interest Litigation Court (राष्ट्रीय लोक अदालत). While the document is partially legible, the critical decision section contains heavy handwriting and marks that make the specific court order difficult to read with certainty. The judgment appears to address a matter involving court fees and procedural issues, with signatures from the presiding judge and panel members dated 14/03/2026. SKIP — The key reasoning and specific decision are not sufficiently clear due to handwritten annotations and unclear text in the critical portions of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Nandgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case