State Government vs Ambadas Narayan Sonawane-4 Advocate - Choudhari Bhalchandra R — 135/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,324,323,504,506,427. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS170007092016
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
574/2016
Filing Date
05-11-2016
Registration No
135/2016
Registration Date
05-11-2016
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Nandgaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. APP-1
Respondent(s)
Ambadas Narayan Sonawane-4 Advocate - Choudhari Bhalchandra R
Samadhan Ambadas Sonawane
Adv. Choudhari Bhalchandra R
Nanasaheb Namdeo Sonawane
Adv. Choudhari Bhalchandra R
Shakuntalabai Ambadas Sonawane
Adv. Choudhari Bhalchandra R
Poonam Samadhan Sonawane
Adv. Choudhari Bhalchandra R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Order Case: FIR No. 135/2016, Nandgaon Police Station Outcome: The cross-examination of the accused was completed. The court found that the complainant's (prosecution witness) testimony contained significant contradictions and inconsistencies when examined by the defense counsel. The accused's defense successfully challenged the credibility of the witness statement regarding the alleged assault on May 31, 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Order Case: FIR No. 135/2016, Nandgaon Police Station Outcome: The cross-examination of the accused was completed. The court found that the complainant's (prosecution witness) testimony contained significant contradictions and inconsistencies when examined by the defense counsel. The accused's defense successfully challenged the credibility of the witness statement regarding the alleged assault on May 31, 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts