WALMIK CHANDRABHAN JAGTAP vs CHINDHA KHANDU BODHARE — 280/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS170006892022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
550/2022
Filing Date
22-07-2022
Registration No
280/2022
Registration Date
22-07-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Nandgaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
WALMIK CHANDRABHAN JAGTAP
Adv. Aher Digambar N
Respondent(s)
CHINDHA KHANDU BODHARE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 22-01-2026 | B.W._Unready | |
| 21-11-2025 | B.W._Unready | |
| 13-09-2025 | B.W._Unready | |
| 14-07-2025 | B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Nandgaon Judicial Magistrate dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Walmik Chandrabhan Jagtap against Chindha Khandu Bodhare for want of prosecution under Section 256 of the CrPC, as the complainant repeatedly failed to appear or take any steps since January 13, 2025. Consequently, the accused stands acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Nandgaon Judicial Magistrate dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Walmik Chandrabhan Jagtap against Chindha Khandu Bodhare for want of prosecution under Section 256 of the CrPC, as the complainant repeatedly failed to appear or take any steps since January 13, 2025. Consequently, the accused stands acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts