State Government vs Chandrakant Walmik Nikam Advocate - Choudhari Bhalchandra R — 141/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,A,504,506,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS170006492018
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
538/2018
Filing Date
20-08-2018
Registration No
141/2018
Registration Date
20-08-2018
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Nandgaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
NANDGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. सरकारी वकील
Respondent(s)
Chandrakant Walmik Nikam Advocate - Choudhari Bhalchandra R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 22-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the prosecution's cross-examination of Witness No. 1 (Kishore Vishwas Garud, age 66) under Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act in FIR No. 141/2018. The witness testified regarding an incident on 16/03/2017 at Pimparkhed village where he was called to the police station and accompanied officials to the crime scene. The court recorded the witness examination and permitted the defense counsel (B.R. Chaudhri) to cross-examine the witness, with no re-examination by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the prosecution's cross-examination of Witness No. 1 (Kishore Vishwas Garud, age 66) under Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act in FIR No. 141/2018. The witness testified regarding an incident on 16/03/2017 at Pimparkhed village where he was called to the police station and accompanied officials to the crime scene. The court recorded the witness examination and permitted the defense counsel (B.R. Chaudhri) to cross-examine the witness, with no re-examination by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts