Shaikh Bashir Haji Mahmad Husen Momin -(DIED) vs Rameshlal Rochaldas Ochani etc. Advocate - Patil Mahesh P — 1700065/2007
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ---. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS170004542007
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1700065/2007
Filing Date
08-10-2007
Registration No
1700065/2007
Registration Date
08-10-2007
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Nandgaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Bashir Haji Mahmad Husen Momin -(DIED)
Adv. Choudhari Bhalchandra R
1-A SOHEL PARVEJ MAHMAD BASHIR MOMIN
1-B ABIDA BASHIR MAHMAD MOMIN
1-C AKHELA MAHMAD AYUB ANSARI
1-D YASMIN SHAIKH MEHMUD
1-E RESHMA NAJMIN SHAIKH UMAR
Respondent(s)
Rameshlal Rochaldas Ochani etc. Advocate - Patil Mahesh P
KHATIJA MAHMAD SAHAB SHAIKH - (DIED)
2-A ABDUL GAFFAR MOHMAD SAHAB
HANIFA GULLUBHAI
CHAND SULTANA SADARBHAI
MUNVAR SULTANA MAHIMUD
RADHESHAM MADANLAL NASHIKKAR
SAGARMAL MADANLAL NASHIKKAR
CHETAN MADHAV JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition regarding a property document dispute is allowed. The court ordered that the document in question be accepted as evidence, directing that documents must be filed properly through official channels and that all parties must provide affidavits regarding document authenticity. The court emphasized that document genuineness can be tested through cross-examination during trial, and the petitioner is entitled to proceed with their legal claims based on the documented evidence. The order was issued on January 29, 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition regarding a property document dispute is allowed. The court ordered that the document in question be accepted as evidence, directing that documents must be filed properly through official channels and that all parties must provide affidavits regarding document authenticity. The court emphasized that document genuineness can be tested through cross-examination during trial, and the petitioner is entitled to proceed with their legal claims based on the documented evidence. The order was issued on January 29, 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts