State Government vs Laxman Bhika Pawar — 176/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(c),65(f). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS170004522025

e-Filing Number

29-05-2025

Filing Number

287/2025

Filing Date

29-May-2025

Registration No

176/2025

Registration Date

29-May-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Nandgaon

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

149

Police Station

NANDGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(c),65(f)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

    Adv. Jaiswal Chetan P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Bhika Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC No. 176/2025 The court stopped proceedings against Laxman Bhika Pawar under Section 258 of the CrPC due to the accused's prolonged absence and the non-filing of the Complaint Advocate (CA) report. The accused was discharged of charges under Section 65(c)(f) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, his bail bond cancelled, and seized materials forwarded to the District Excise Officer for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 03-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  6. 28-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  7. 29-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 176/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC No. 176/2025 The court stopped proceedings against Laxman Bhika Pawar under Section 258 of the CrPC due to the accused's prolonged absence and the non-filing of the Complaint Advocate (CA) report. The accused was discharged of charges under Section 65(c)(f) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, his bail bond cancelled, and seized materials forwarded to the District Excise Officer for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case