State Excise Satana vs Karbhari Suresh More — 111/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(b),65(c),65(e),65(f). Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS170002482025

Filing Number

165/2025

Filing Date

15-Mar-2025

Registration No

111/2025

Registration Date

15-Mar-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Nandgaon

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECIDED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(b),65(c),65(e),65(f)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Excise Satana

    Adv. Jaiswal Chetan P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karbhari Suresh More

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped criminal proceedings against Karbhari Suresh More under Section 258 of CrPC and discharged him of offences under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Section 65(b)(c)(e)(f)) due to his prolonged absence and the non-filing of the Chemist Analyst (CA) report, finding no purpose in continuing the matter. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and seized materials were forwarded to the District Excise Officer for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 14-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 15-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  6. 15-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 15-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped criminal proceedings against Karbhari Suresh More under Section 258 of CrPC and discharged him of offences under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Section 65(b)(c)(e)(f)) due to his prolonged absence and the non-filing of the Chemist Analyst (CA) report, finding no purpose in continuing the matter. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and seized materials were forwarded to the District Excise Officer for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case