State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Ramdas Nana Pawar Advocate - Mahale gorakhnath M. — 803/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160019292024
Filing Number
1565/2024
Filing Date
23-Oct-2024
Registration No
803/2024
Registration Date
23-Oct-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
2-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station
Adv. Walke Rakesh M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramdas Nana Pawar Advocate - Mahale gorakhnath M.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Ramdas Nana Pawar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, citing the case as stale and ineffective due to the accused's continuous absence despite repeated summons and warrants. The accused was discharged of the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, his bail bond was cancelled, and seized country liquor was ordered to be disposed by the Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
03-Feb-2026
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
03-Dec-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
11-Sep-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
30-Jul-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
12-Jun-2025
Charge
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
26-Mar-2025
Charge
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
07-Jan-2025
Charge
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
03-Dec-2024
Charge
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
23-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 803/2024
The court discharged accused Ramdas Nana Pawar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, citing the case as stale and ineffective due to the accused's continuous absence despite repeated summons and warrants. The accused was discharged of the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, his bail bond was cancelled, and seized country liquor was ordered to be disposed by the Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts