State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Avinash Ramchandra Damale — 729/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160015752025

Filing Number

1230/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

729/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

2-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

300

Police Station

WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station

    Adv. App. Walke Rakesh M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Avinash Ramchandra Damale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused Avinash Ramchandra Damale for the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The decision was based on the accused's continuous absence despite repeated summons and warrants, making the case stale and ineffective with no prospect of conclusion. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and the confiscated liquor was ordered to be disposed by the Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 729/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused Avinash Ramchandra Damale for the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The decision was based on the accused's continuous absence despite repeated summons and warrants, making the case stale and ineffective with no prospect of conclusion. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and the confiscated liquor was ordered to be disposed by the Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case