State through Chandwad Police Station vs Jitendra Ramchandra Mane — 727/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160015732025

Filing Number

1228/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

727/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

2-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

206

Police Station

WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Chandwad Police Station

    Adv. App. Walke Rakesh M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jitendra Ramchandra Mane

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused Jitendra Ramchandra Mane from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act due to the case becoming stale and ineffective. The discharge was warranted because despite repeated summons and warrants, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence over an extended period, making further prosecution unlikely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 727/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused Jitendra Ramchandra Mane from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act due to the case becoming stale and ineffective. The discharge was warranted because despite repeated summons and warrants, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence over an extended period, making further prosecution unlikely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case