State through Chandwad Police Station vs Mukesh Namdev Bhosale Advocate - Aher Dhananjay A. — 703/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160015672023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1271/2023
Filing Date
27-11-2023
Registration No
703/2023
Registration Date
27-11-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
116
Police Station
CHANDWAD POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Chandwad Police Station
Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP
Respondent(s)
Mukesh Namdev Bhosale Advocate - Aher Dhananjay A.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Disposed
Evidence
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-08-2025 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 25-06-2025 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 10-01-2025 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted Mukesh Namdev Bhosale of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The decision was based on the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of the chemical analysis report, and prolonged case pendency without progress, which amounted to abuse of process and wastage of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted Mukesh Namdev Bhosale of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The decision was based on the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of the chemical analysis report, and prolonged case pendency without progress, which amounted to abuse of process and wastage of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts