State through Chandwad Police Station vs Mukesh Namdev Bhosale Advocate - Aher Dhananjay A. — 703/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160015672023
Filing Number
1271/2023
Filing Date
27-Nov-2023
Registration No
703/2023
Registration Date
27-Nov-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
116
Police Station
CHANDWAD POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through Chandwad Police Station
Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mukesh Namdev Bhosale Advocate - Aher Dhananjay A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court acquitted Mukesh Namdev Bhosale of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The decision was based on the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of the chemical analysis report, and prolonged case pendency without progress, which amounted to abuse of process and wastage of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
30-Jan-2026
PleaView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
29-Aug-2025
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
25-Jun-2025
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Jan-2025
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
05-Sep-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
11-Jun-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
20-Feb-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
27-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 703/2023
Summary The court acquitted Mukesh Namdev Bhosale of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The decision was based on the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of the chemical analysis report, and prolonged case pendency without progress, which amounted to abuse of process and wastage of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts