State through Chandwad Police Station vs Mukesh Namdev Bhosale Advocate - Aher Dhananjay A. — 703/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160015672023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1271/2023

Filing Date

27-11-2023

Registration No

703/2023

Registration Date

27-11-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

116

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State through Chandwad Police Station

Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP

Respondent(s)

Mukesh Namdev Bhosale Advocate - Aher Dhananjay A.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad

10-03-2026

Disposed

30-01-2026

Evidence

29-08-2025

Plea / Particulars

25-06-2025

Plea / Particulars

10-01-2025

Unready Board

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court acquitted Mukesh Namdev Bhosale of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The decision was based on the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of the chemical analysis report, and prolonged case pendency without progress, which amounted to abuse of process and wastage of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

30-01-2026
Plea
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted Mukesh Namdev Bhosale of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The decision was based on the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of the chemical analysis report, and prolonged case pendency without progress, which amounted to abuse of process and wastage of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case