Jyoti Shubham Aher vs Shuibham Ravindra Aher Advocate - Gangurde Dattu R. — 231/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS160015492023
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
27-10-2023
Filing Number
323/2023
Filing Date
20-11-2023
Registration No
231/2023
Registration Date
20-11-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jyoti Shubham Aher
Adv. sachin walunj
Anvi Shubham Aher
Adv. sachin walunj
Respondent(s)
Shuibham Ravindra Aher Advocate - Gangurde Dattu R.
Ravindra Punjaram Aher
Vandana Ravindra Aher
Kunal Ravindra Aher
Punjaram Karbhari Aher
Bhausaheb Punjaram Aher
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 03-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 22-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 16-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In the case Jyoti Aher v. Shubham Aher (Regular Civil Suit No. 231/2023), the court allowed the respondents' (Defendants 1-4) application to recall the no-show order passed against them on 21.11.2024, conditioned upon payment of Rs. 500/- as costs to the plaintiff. The court noted that while the respondents delayed filing their written statement beyond the 90-day period, they were entitled to present their defense, and the penalty was imposed to account for the delay caused to the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In the case Jyoti Aher v. Shubham Aher (Regular Civil Suit No. 231/2023), the court allowed the respondents' (Defendants 1-4) application to recall the no-show order passed against them on 21.11.2024, conditioned upon payment of Rs. 500/- as costs to the plaintiff. The court noted that while the respondents delayed filing their written statement beyond the 90-day period, they were entitled to present their defense, and the penalty was imposed to account for the delay caused to the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts