Rakhmabai Vishwanath Pawar vs Ashok Devram Pawar — 229/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS160015442023
e-Filing Number
09-11-2023
Filing Number
321/2023
Filing Date
10-Nov-2023
Registration No
229/2023
Registration Date
10-Nov-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
2-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rakhmabai Vishwanath Pawar
Adv. Sachin Kulkarni
-
2.Pravin Vishwanath Pawar
Adv. Sachin Kulkarni
-
3.Vanita Suresh Navale
Adv. Sachin Kulkarni
-
4.Manisha Dnyaneshwar Chavhan
Adv. Sachin Kulkarni
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ashok Devram Pawar
-
2.Alka Ashok Pawar
-
3.Nivrutti Devram Pawar
-
4.Balu Devram Pawar
-
5.Bhimabai Shriram Chavhan
-
6.Popat Nivrutti Pawar
-
7.Mangala Balu Pawar
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
17-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
07-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
06-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
04-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
15-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 229/2023 The court allowed the respondents' (Defendants 1, 2, and 5) application for condonation of delay in filing their written statement and reply, which was delayed by approximately 11 months and 8 days. The court found that despite receiving sufficient time after service of summons, the respondents failed to file their affidavit and statement timely, but granted them the opportunity to present their defense in accordance with natural justice principles. The respondents were ordered to pay Rs. 300/- to the petitioners as compensation for the delay, after which their written statement and reply would be accepted on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
25-Jul-2025
Reply/Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
08-May-2025
Reply/Say
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
28-Apr-2025
Reply/Say
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
19-Mar-2025
Reply/Say
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
04-Feb-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
02-Jan-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
02-Dec-2024
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
07-Oct-2024
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
13-Aug-2024
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
18-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
27-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
03-Apr-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
27-Feb-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Jan-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
09-Dec-2023
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 229/2023
Case Summary: 229/2023 The court allowed the respondents' (Defendants 1, 2, and 5) application for condonation of delay in filing their written statement and reply, which was delayed by approximately 11 months and 8 days. The court found that despite receiving sufficient time after service of summons, the respondents failed to file their affidavit and statement timely, but granted them the opportunity to present their defense in accordance with natural justice principles. The respondents were ordered to pay Rs. 300/- to the petitioners as compensation for the delay, after which their written statement and reply would be accepted on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts