State through Chandwad Police Station vs Sachin Uttam Kshirsagar Advocate - Gangurde Dattu R. — 679/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160015002023

Filing Number

1228/2023

Filing Date

02-Nov-2023

Registration No

679/2023

Registration Date

02-Nov-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

280

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

1.State through Chandwad Police Station

Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Sachin Uttam Kshirsagar Advocate - Gangurde Dattu R.

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary The court discharged the accused Sachin Uttam Kshirsagar in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e)) by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, citing the accused's prolonged absence despite multiple summons/warrants and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence. The court found this a fit case to stop proceedings to prevent abuse of process and wastage of public time and resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
10-Mar-2026

Disposed

Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
30-Jan-2026

N.B.W._Unready

Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
23-Sep-2025

Plea / Particulars

Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
23-May-2025

Unready Board

Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
13-Nov-2024

Unready Board

Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
06-Aug-2024

Unready Board

Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
24-Apr-2024

Unready Board

Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
16-Jan-2024

Unready Board

Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
02-Nov-2023

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
02-Nov-2023

Case filed

Registration No. 679/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged the accused Sachin Uttam Kshirsagar in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e)) by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, citing the accused's prolonged absence despite multiple summons/warrants and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence. The court found this a fit case to stop proceedings to prevent abuse of process and wastage of public time and resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.