State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Bhausaheb Ashok Gangurde Advocate - Thormise Arun S — 653/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160014602023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1195/2023
Filing Date
23-10-2023
Registration No
653/2023
Registration Date
23-10-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
144
Police Station
WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station
Adv. App Surwade Ravindra B.
Respondent(s)
Bhausaheb Ashok Gangurde Advocate - Thormise Arun S
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Disposed
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-12-2025 | Filing of Surety | |
| 04-09-2025 | Filing of Surety | |
| 28-07-2025 | Filing of Surety | |
| 21-03-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused Bhausaheb Ashok Gangurde of gambling charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Act, 1887. The court found the case stale and ineffective, as the accused had been absconding since October 2024 and despite repeated summons/warrants, prosecution failed to secure his presence, making continued prosecution futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused Bhausaheb Ashok Gangurde of gambling charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Act, 1887. The court found the case stale and ineffective, as the accused had been absconding since October 2024 and despite repeated summons/warrants, prosecution failed to secure his presence, making continued prosecution futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts