State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik vs Shashikant Gangadhar Naik Advocate - Jadhav Shantaram D — 647/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160014542023
Filing Number
1189/2023
Filing Date
23-Oct-2023
Registration No
647/2023
Registration Date
23-Oct-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik
Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shashikant Gangadhar Naik Advocate - Jadhav Shantaram D
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court discharged accused Shashikant Gangadhar Naik and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act case. The judgment cited prolonged delays, prosecution's failure to file the chemical analysis report, inability to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, and the absence of progress to avoid abuse of judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
30-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
28-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
09-May-2025
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
13-Dec-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
06-Aug-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
26-Apr-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
12-Jan-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
23-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 647/2023
Summary The court discharged accused Shashikant Gangadhar Naik and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act case. The judgment cited prolonged delays, prosecution's failure to file the chemical analysis report, inability to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, and the absence of progress to avoid abuse of judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts