State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik vs Sameer Vikram Jadhav Advocate - Kale Pankaj V. — 645/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160014522023

Filing Number

1187/2023

Filing Date

23-Oct-2023

Registration No

645/2023

Registration Date

23-Oct-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik

    Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sameer Vikram Jadhav Advocate - Kale Pankaj V.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Sameer Vikram Jadhav in a Bombay Prohibition Act case, invoking Section 258 of the CrPC due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons/warrants, missing chemical analysis report, and prolonged case delay. The court found it a fit case to stop proceedings to prevent abuse of process and waste of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    N.B.W._Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  5. 28-Aug-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 09-May-2025

    Unready Board

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  7. 13-Dec-2024

    Unready Board

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  8. 06-Aug-2024

    Unready Board

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  9. 26-Apr-2024

    Unready Board

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  10. 12-Jan-2024

    Unready Board

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  11. 23-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 23-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 645/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Sameer Vikram Jadhav in a Bombay Prohibition Act case, invoking Section 258 of the CrPC due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons/warrants, missing chemical analysis report, and prolonged case delay. The court found it a fit case to stop proceedings to prevent abuse of process and waste of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case