Kiyan Rupesh Thombare vs Rupesh Ramdas Thombare — 270/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Civil suit (injunction). Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

Notice_Unready Next hearing 07-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS160014322025

e-Filing Number

07-11-2025

Filing Number

386/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

270/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

2-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Civil suit (injunction)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kiyan Rupesh Thombare

    Adv. ADV. NITIN WALKE

  2. 2.Snehal Rupesh Thombare

    Adv. ADV. NITIN WALKE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rupesh Ramdas Thombare

Case History

  1. 07-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 15-Jan-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In this partition suit (R.C.S. 270/2025), the court rejected the plaintiff's application for an ad-interim injunction, finding insufficient substance and urgency. The court issued a show cause notice to defendants returnable on 05.12.2025, directing them to explain why an interim injunction should not be granted, and allowed expedited service by publication if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 270/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In this partition suit (R.C.S. 270/2025), the court rejected the plaintiff's application for an ad-interim injunction, finding insufficient substance and urgency. The court issued a show cause notice to defendants returnable on 05.12.2025, directing them to explain why an interim injunction should not be granted, and allowed expedited service by publication if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case