State through Chandwad Police Station vs Prashant Shankar Bhadane Advocate - Jadhav Vikas V — 724/2019
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160012402019
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1172/2019
Filing Date
08-11-2019
Registration No
724/2019
Registration Date
08-11-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Chandwad Police Station
Adv. Mirza Aijaz J. APP
Respondent(s)
Prashant Shankar Bhadane Advocate - Jadhav Vikas V
Ishwar dinkar Jadhav
Pramod Somnath Jadhav
Ravindra vilas Nirbhavane
Rajesh Anil Bankar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-09-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the petition in full and dismissed the case without requiring further response. In this gambling case (FIR 724/2019), the First Class Magistrate at Chandwad found the prosecution's examination contradictory and unreliable, while the accused's cross-examination testimony was credible and consistent. The court concluded there was insufficient evidence to prove the charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the petition in full and dismissed the case without requiring further response. In this gambling case (FIR 724/2019), the First Class Magistrate at Chandwad found the prosecution's examination contradictory and unreliable, while the accused's cross-examination testimony was credible and consistent. The court concluded there was insufficient evidence to prove the charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts