State through Chandwad Police Station vs Prashant Shankar Bhadane Advocate - Jadhav Vikas V — 724/2019

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 13-May-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160012402019

Filing Number

1172/2019

Filing Date

08-Nov-2019

Registration No

724/2019

Registration Date

08-Nov-2019

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Chandwad Police Station

    Adv. Mirza Aijaz J. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prashant Shankar Bhadane Advocate - Jadhav Vikas V

  2. 2.Ishwar dinkar Jadhav

  3. 3.Pramod Somnath Jadhav

  4. 4.Ravindra vilas Nirbhavane

  5. 5.Rajesh Anil Bankar

Case History

  1. 13-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  5. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  7. 26-Aug-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the petition in full and dismissed the case without requiring further response. In this gambling case (FIR 724/2019), the First Class Magistrate at Chandwad found the prosecution's examination contradictory and unreliable, while the accused's cross-examination testimony was credible and consistent. The court concluded there was insufficient evidence to prove the charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  9. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  10. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  11. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  12. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  13. 02-May-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  14. 25-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  15. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  16. 23-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  17. 06-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  18. 26-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  19. 29-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  20. 13-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  21. 29-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  22. 17-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  23. 23-Mar-2022

    N.B.W._Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  24. 10-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  25. 13-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  26. 16-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  27. 06-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  28. 05-May-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  29. 09-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  30. 07-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  31. 24-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  32. 29-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  33. 03-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  34. 14-May-2020

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  35. 26-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  36. 13-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  37. 11-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  38. 08-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 08-Nov-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 724/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the petition in full and dismissed the case without requiring further response. In this gambling case (FIR 724/2019), the First Class Magistrate at Chandwad found the prosecution's examination contradictory and unreliable, while the accused's cross-examination testimony was credible and consistent. The court concluded there was insufficient evidence to prove the charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case