State through Chandwad Police Station vs Sunil Muralidhar Kandalkar — 527/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160011412025

Filing Number

896/2025

Filing Date

28-Aug-2025

Registration No

527/2025

Registration Date

28-Aug-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

72

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Chandwad Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Muralidhar Kandalkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court at Chandwad discharged accused Sunil Murlidhar Kandalkar in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e)) by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, did not file the chemical analysis report, and allowed the matter to linger without progress, constituting an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  5. 28-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 527/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court at Chandwad discharged accused Sunil Murlidhar Kandalkar in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e)) by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, did not file the chemical analysis report, and allowed the matter to linger without progress, constituting an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case