State through Chandwad Police Station vs Sunil Sitaram Pawar — 526/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160011402025

Filing Number

895/2025

Filing Date

28-Aug-2025

Registration No

526/2025

Registration Date

28-Aug-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

150

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Chandwad Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Sitaram Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court acquitted accused Sunil Sitaram Pawar and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act case, citing prosecutorial failures including inability to secure the accused's presence, non-submission of chemical analysis reports, and repeated issuance of unexecuted summons/warrants. The court invoked these powers to prevent abuse of process and wastage of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    PleaView PDF

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 28-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 526/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted accused Sunil Sitaram Pawar and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act case, citing prosecutorial failures including inability to secure the accused's presence, non-submission of chemical analysis reports, and repeated issuance of unexecuted summons/warrants. The court invoked these powers to prevent abuse of process and wastage of public resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case