State through Chandwad Police Station vs Mahesh Namdev Bhosale — 524/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160011382025

Filing Number

893/2025

Filing Date

28-Aug-2025

Registration No

524/2025

Registration Date

28-Aug-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

252

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Chandwad Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahesh Namdev Bhosale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court acquitted Mahesh Namdeo Bhosale in a Bombay Prohibition Act case by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, citing prosecutorial failures including repeated inability to secure the accused's presence, failure to file the chemical analysis report, and case delay. The court found this appropriate to prevent abuse of process and waste of public resources, and accordingly cancelled all bail bonds and recalled the non-bailable warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    PleaView PDF

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 28-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 524/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted Mahesh Namdeo Bhosale in a Bombay Prohibition Act case by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, citing prosecutorial failures including repeated inability to secure the accused's presence, failure to file the chemical analysis report, and case delay. The court found this appropriate to prevent abuse of process and waste of public resources, and accordingly cancelled all bail bonds and recalled the non-bailable warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case