State through Chandwad Police Station vs Waliba Ashok Sonawane — 505/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160010952025

Filing Number

860/2025

Filing Date

19-Aug-2025

Registration No

505/2025

Registration Date

19-Aug-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

85

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Chandwad Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Waliba Ashok Sonawane

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted accused Valiba Ashok Sonwane in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e) offense) by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, citing prolonged delay, repeated failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, and the prosecution's failure to file the required chemical analysis report. The court found it a fit case to stop proceedings to prevent abuse of process and waste of public resources, canceling all bail bonds and recalling the non-bailable warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    B.W._Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    B.W._Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 505/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted accused Valiba Ashok Sonwane in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e) offense) by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, citing prolonged delay, repeated failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, and the prosecution's failure to file the required chemical analysis report. The court found it a fit case to stop proceedings to prevent abuse of process and waste of public resources, canceling all bail bonds and recalling the non-bailable warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case