State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Dilip Popat Rakibe Advocate - Pawar Popatrao D. — 436/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160010742024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
860/2024
Filing Date
25-06-2024
Registration No
436/2024
Registration Date
25-06-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
201
Police Station
WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station
Adv. App Surwade Ravindra B.
Respondent(s)
Dilip Popat Rakibe Advocate - Pawar Popatrao D.
Gorakh Balu Bachhav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 05-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 10-09-2025 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 28-07-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged accused Dilip Popat Rakibe and another under section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to their continuous absence despite repeated summons/warrants, making the case stale and ineffective. The proceedings were stopped, the accused's bail bond cancelled, and seized liquor was ordered for disposal by the Excise Department while the seized motorcycle was to be returned to the claimant or sold if unclaimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged accused Dilip Popat Rakibe and another under section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to their continuous absence despite repeated summons/warrants, making the case stale and ineffective. The proceedings were stopped, the accused's bail bond cancelled, and seized liquor was ordered for disposal by the Excise Department while the seized motorcycle was to be returned to the claimant or sold if unclaimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts