State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Pappu alias Pramod Kisan More — 479/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160010392025

Filing Number

816/2025

Filing Date

02-Aug-2025

Registration No

479/2025

Registration Date

02-Aug-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

2-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

124

Police Station

WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pappu alias Pramod Kisan More

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Pappu @Pramod Kisan More under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding the case stale and ineffective due to the accused's continuous absence despite repeated summons and warrants. The accused was discharged of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, and the seized 17 bottles of country liquor were ordered to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 02-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 479/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Pappu @Pramod Kisan More under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding the case stale and ineffective due to the accused's continuous absence despite repeated summons and warrants. The accused was discharged of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, and the seized 17 bottles of country liquor were ordered to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case