State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Sumit Laxman Jadhav — 379/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 (a) (e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160009522024
Filing Number
770/2024
Filing Date
13-Jun-2024
Registration No
379/2024
Registration Date
13-Jun-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
2-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
173
Police Station
WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station
Adv. App Surwade Ravindra B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sumit Laxman Jadhav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court stopped criminal proceedings against accused Sumit Lakshaman Jadhav under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged him for the liquor offense under the Bombay Prohibition Act. The decision was based on the accused's continuous absence despite repeated summons/warrants, making case conclusion unlikely and rendering the case stale and ineffective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
11-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
06-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
19-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
14-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
12-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
21-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
27-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
26-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
13-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 379/2024
Summary The court stopped criminal proceedings against accused Sumit Lakshaman Jadhav under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged him for the liquor offense under the Bombay Prohibition Act. The decision was based on the accused's continuous absence despite repeated summons/warrants, making case conclusion unlikely and rendering the case stale and ineffective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts